Despite the fact that I rarely drink hard alcohol, I still want these.
“Work is the curse of the drinking class.”
That Oscar Wilde, so witty.
Busting out bad joints all over the place
Despite the fact that I rarely drink hard alcohol, I still want these.
“Work is the curse of the drinking class.”
That Oscar Wilde, so witty.
Check out Ann Brashares house, profiled in the NY Times.
It’s very rare that I like any movie better than the book, and considering I really enjoyed Zoë Heller’s novel, to say I was surprised by the film is kind of an understatement.
Notes on a Scandal follows the story of an upper-class British woman, Sheba Hart (Blanchett), who has an affair with one of her students, 15-year-old Steven Connolly (played by newcomer Andrew Simpson), and must rely upon her much older friend Barbara (Dench) once the affair comes out and her life falls apart.
Only the film is from Barbara’s perspective, it follows her life, her narrative and tells the story from her point of view. This means we hear of Sheba’s affair second hand, through her retelling of it to Barbara, once the elder woman discovers the lovers in the classroom, ahem, in a precarious position. And Barbara, or “Bar” as Sheba calls her, is nuts, driven to the point of obsession by utter loneliness and maybe a bit of a predilection for mistaking friendship for the intimacy normally found between two adults in a romantic relationship.
But you say, it stars Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett, of course it’s going to be good. And yes, Dench’s Barbara is totally creepy and quite obsessed, and Blanchett’s Sheba is one part flighty, one part entitled and always beautiful, which is perfect casting. However, why the film succeeds has more to do with how it manipulates narrative exposition to its advantage. In bookish films where the “book” aspects don’t usually work (ahem, Possession, I’m looking at you), it totally ruins the film for me. Here, however, Barbara’s obsessive note-taking and journal writing underpins her character so perfectly that it actually makes the movie. And it doesn’t hurt that the script is bloody brilliant.
There are a couple of cringeworthy moments, and Bill Nighy as Sheba’s husband is stupendous casting (LOVE him), and on the whole, I liked this movie far, far better than I thought I would.
How cute is this? And I hope that the sweater class that I’ve just signed up for does not result in my own version of the “Frankensweater.”
The second book in my Around the World in 52 Books challenge is Jennifer Clement’s A True Story Based on Lies. I’m counting this as Mexico, although I’m not sure if the author herself is Mexican, but the novel is set in Mexico City.
The story folllows the lives of two women, one a rich young girl called Aura, whose chapters are all entitled ‘Every Leaf is a Mouth,’ and Leonora, a servant in her household (and her mother), whose headings are all called ‘Some Things Were Overheard and Some Said it Was All a Rumor.’ As you can probably guess, it’s not a simple story as Aura has no idea Leonora is her mother, and the book travels through the latter’s past to tell us the story of how the child came to be.
Leonora is a young, impressionable, impoverished girl sent to the convent by her broom-making mother. They live on the outskirts of Mexico City and have been broom-makers for generations. As the book opens, Leonora’s own mother explains that generations of twig-collecting girls have been born with mothers wearing no wedding rings:
“‘All the fingers in our family are buried without wedding rings. Under the ground there are bouquets of fingers without wedding rings.’ Leonora imagines the pale, white bones of her grandmothers’ fingers buried beneath the earth.”
In an effort to improve her life for good, Leonora is sent away to the convent, where Mrs. O’Connor finds her and brings her to be a nanny and a servant in her household. Once there, Mr. O’Connor takes a liking to her, and eventually gets Leonora pregnant. The child is taken away, and registered as Mrs. O’Connor’s, which means a complex relationship begins where Leonora tends to the child, but Aura has no idea she is her mother.
Clement, from what I understand, is a poet first, and the sparse, short paragraphs of this book are filled with lots of sweet bits of metaphorical language, folklore, catechism, magic as well as the actual story. It’s a short book, just over 150 pages, but with each paragraph just being a sentence, and much of the book repeating thoughts, images and motifs, it’s a short read.
What I liked: the way Clement tells a very complex story about class, race, infidelity and motherhood, in an almost prose poem kind of way. The ending of the novel is utterly heartbreaking, and after reading Consumption, I feel more than ever that every book I’m going to read on this challenge will break my heart. Clement excels at characterization though, as sparse as it is through the book, simple details, like Aura being unable to control her hands (one moves one way; the other another), form complete pictures in my mind.
I also thoroughly enjoyed the fact that this was a story primarily about women. And even though the actions of the men (Mr. O’Connor and his two sons) greatly impact their lives, much of the book feels feminine and reflects these women’s particular strengths. Alongside Leonora are Sofia, the oldest servant in the household, and Josefa, the cleaner, who only speaks in one word sentences.
What I didn’t like: sometimes I find that poets who write novels can’t quite escape their tendency to break traditional form and structure. While for the most part it works, there’s a section near the end, all in italics, where a pivotal moment is happening, that essentially repeats all of the folklore-esque bits from throughout Leonora’s section for over 10 pages. Here, I thought, it would have been more powerful to actually explain what happened in a more straightforward way, but it’s a small nitpicky kind of criticism.
I’m not sure if I would highly recommend this book, like I would Kevin Patterson‘s novel, but it certainly gave me a flavour and a taste of gender and race relations during the middle of the last century in Mexico, and that’s not something I read about everyday. And super props to my friend RC who loaned me this novel and happily gave me my Mexico!
I just found this article on CTV.ca about Consumption where Kevin Patterson describes the one job that novels are supposed to do:
“It’s a novel, and novels only have one job, and that’s to break your heart,” Patterson says. “Novels with agendas and messages are frequently bad novels, and certainly the more undisguised and obvious those agendas are, generally, the worse the novel is. So I want the reader to be moved and I want the reader’s heart to be broken.”
And he’s so right; his novel squished my heart into pieces. Now I regret being so flippant about how hot he is when I saw him read in November. He’s hot AND smart. Sheesh.
Fingers crossed this works! Here’s a video from our fancy-dancy new camera of us taking a cab back to the hotel from Old Havana.
So last year, my one Revolution was to be healthy and live like a normal girl again. And old girl, but a normal one none the less, and I think I almost got there. After a shaky start with the ups and downs of the medicine for the disease, and another solid year away from the Boss From Hell (who I was dreaming about last night; it was a nightmare actually), I feel like I am gaining traction and steadily moving towards a calmer, simpler version of “Ragdoll.” Call her version 3.50.
What’s on deck for this year? Well, I’ve got to lose some weight. After a year off and on and off an on prednisone, and a full two years into my tragic hip’s recovery, it’s time to get serious about the weight I’ve gained. I know everyone has this goal but I’m going to try to make it a reality. I’ve got my health almost under control; it’s time to stop being so lazy about it.
The other main revolution involves writing: I want to finish the first draft of this big story I’ve been working on; the one I’m workshopping at Humber (got my first note from my mentor yesterday; it was kind of scary!). In order to at least give this the old college try, I’m going to have to stop watching so much TV (noooo!) and cut down on the movies (nooooo!) but the writing time has to come from somewhere.
Lastly, I’m going to try not to complain so much. Those of you who know (and I hope love) me know that I complain a lot. A LOT. Perhaps more than any relatively healthy, happy and perfectly normal person should. It’s just what I do and it’s got to stop, maybe not all at once, but I’m certainly going to try to be more aware of it and approach everything with an open mind. Let’s hope this one even makes it to January 2nd.
And finally, although this isn’t my own personal revolution, it’s more about my RRHB, as he stops working and embarks upon the giant and massive project that is the renovation of our house, I’m going to do less nagging and not worry so much about the money. He needs some time and space to both finish this project and to find out what he wants to do beyond the rock and roll, which may or may not happen this year, but it certainly needs to while he’s still young enough to make the change.
How about you all out there? Any Revolutions on your fronts?
It’s oddly fitting that this book straddled my 2006-2007 reading; it’s possibly the best book I’ve read in ages. And it made me cry, full, flooding tears dripping onto the pages. Kevin Patterson’s brilliant novel, and I use that word without a hint of exaggeration, centres around a young Inuit girl named Victoria who leaves the north when she’s diagnosed with TB to return a virtual stranger becomes an epic tale of how change impacts a culture, which in turn, affects every single character in Consumption.
The title that refers at once to both the disease and to our own consumptive culture, becomes a metaphor for what happens to every single character in the book. Victoria is consumed by the disease and then obsessed with it for the rest of her life. Robertson, a Hudson Bay man and Victoria’s husband, becomes consumed with both his love for her and his own material success, striving to find a balance between the place he’s fallen for, the Arctic, and the world defined by his own skin colour. Their children, Pauloosie, Justine and Marie, each struggle with growing up in a world, even in the north, more and more defined by material culture. And each child reacts in his or her own way: Pauloosie, who rebels against his father by turning to his grandfather and the land; Justine, who leaves Rankin Inlet the first chance she can get; and Marie, who becomes lost in so many different, heartbreaking ways.
On the periphery of Victoria’s life are Bernard and Keith, the community’s priest and doctor respectively, and each struggle with their own commitments to their professions and to the barren world they have come to both know and love. The teachers, Johanna and Penny, who go their separate ways, one toward love, the other toward the land, and come to very different ends, and Keith’s family back in the States, especially his niece Amanda, who finds her own struggles as a result of her parents’ split.
And there’s also the story of the third generation, as the Cubans say, of Victoria’s parents, Winnie and Emo, who themselves come in off the land when she’s taken south to be cured of her TB. Emo takes a job at the newly opened nickel mine and all of their lives are forever changed.
This book is as much about the struggle to remain true in an ever-changing world as it is about the inevitable problems that occur as a result of said change. The moments cannot be taken back, like a wheel set in motion, to use a tired old metaphor, the culture of Patterson’s novel explores the very essence of change in the Arctic, using the body, and its diseases, almost as a trope to describe what’s happening within.
But what I liked most of all about this book is the clinical eye of Patterson, himself a doctor, as he speaks through Keith Balthazar toward the end of the novel, in a section entitled, “The Diseases of Affluence.”
When the immune system is never called upon, it behaves the way underworked soldiers do and makes trouble. If it’s not finding infections, then it must not be looking hard enough. So it looks harder, and starts to detect infections that aren’t there: thus the terrible toll of autoimmune disease rises steadily in our era of antiseptic floors and single-child families.
An apt description of both my own perilous health situation and a metaphor perhaps for our entire world. We look so hard for what’s wrong with us, questing for happiness and material gain, that we haven’t noticed that we’ve infected our own surroundings in ways we can’t even fathom yet.
There are moments in this book, little unexpected bits of tragedy that come upon you so suddenly that reveal Patterson’s deft hand as a novelist. There are a few spots where the narrative voice breaks, cracks slightly under the pressure of this immense story, but nowhere does it pull you out so much that you lose your way. These characters, so rich and full of life in ways that it’s hard to describe without giving the story away, are broad and introspective all at the same time.
I left this book many times, the first time, in the summer when I started to read it and just couldn’t get into it; the second, just before we left for Cuba because I didn’t want to take a hardcover with me; and the last, between New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day because I thought it would be the perfect book to start off my reading for this year. But am I ever glad I finished it. In the end, it remains probably the best book I read in 2006, which is no small feat considering the fact that in that year I also tackled two Jane Austen novels and a Giller Prize winner. It’s the first book on my 52 Countries in 52 Books challenge, and even though it doesn’t get me any closer to the 1001 Books challenge, it does make me start my reading at home, here in Canada.
I would highly recommend this book to readers and writers; it’s one for the shelves for sure.
Whew. Are we ever, ever glad to be home from Cuba. As my RRHB said, “Wanting to be home isn’t the way to end a holiday.”
In short, the good: the beach, which is stunningly beautiful, the island, which is hauntingly the same as its almost frozen in time with its steadily decaying buildings, its old cars, and its strangely ironic absence of American anything.
We visited some amazing things: the caves where we snorkeled underground, the city of Trinidad, Havana, an old ranch run by a man born in the very house where we had lunch, whose history was translated for us by a youngster from Montreal, and saw Che’s memorial at Santa Clara. Oh, and the highlight for me? Seeing Hemingway’s house in Havana, spectacular. We also spent a wonderful couple of days on the beach at Varadero. One afternoon, we walked for hours in the ocean, sort of half-floating along enjoying the sunshine and each other’s inexplicable good moods.
The bad: anything and everything about the “resort,” the food, abysmal, the room, smelled like mould and had terribly uncomfortable beds, the fact that Conquest, the “reputable” tour company forgot to mention that we had to pay for our meals in Havana, how everyone in the country is so starved for tips that they dance for the tourists while we gorge ourselves on buffets of food that very few could ever afford or have the means to buy. We felt awful. As my RRHB said, “I’m going to feel guilty about this for years.”
The downright ugly: our hotel in Havana was awful. And we spent our last days in Cuba deathly ill, both of us aching more for home than for the glorious sunshine that seemed to cater to us the entire week we were there. The meals that made us sick, which was just about every day at the buffet. We spent our anniversary night sleeping in a room that smelled faintly of urine in two single beds. How romantic.
The strange: the two days that it rained, we were on a bus (doing the Three Cities tour, Santa Clara, Cienfuego and Trinidad), and then in a jeep driven by a maniacal Italian man who spoke no English, which didn’t, in the least, stop him from trying to communicate with us, where we did a Nature Tour that involved driving through the backyards of some of the poorest people I had ever seen, with garbage strewn all over, picked through by packs of homeless dogs, as we used up more of the country’s natural resources to carry us through a version of the ‘true’ Cuba. We also went to see the Tropicana show in Havana, which is a spectacle to end all spectacles.
On the whole, we were very disappointed in the “resort,” and even more so by our hotel in Havana, which was so far away from the centre of the city, where all the action is, that we had to take a cab that cost 15 CUC, the equal of about $20.00 Cdn just to get back from the day we spent in the old section.
But the most heartbreaking part of it all? How much time is wasted on buses, from the airport the the resorts, from the resort to Havana, a two hour journey, stretched out to over four hours by the time everyone is dropped off and picked up, wasting almost an entire day of a seven day trip. What is that?
But I read 4 books, 3 were advance reading copies, so I can’t talk about them until they’re published and the last was a really bad chicklit novel by Jane Green called Mr. Maybe, which takes my reading to 69. Fingers crossed I get to 70 by tomorrow.
Happy New Year everyone! It’s so good to be home! Hope you all have a good night to night and I look forward to hearing all about your New Year’s Revolutions!